Home Categories About
argument top image
Should countries accept immigrants? Should countries accept immigrants?
Yes, countries should accept immigrants Yes, countries should accept immigrants
No, countries should not accept immigrants No, countries should not accept immigrants
Immigrants positively affect the economy Immigrants positively affect the economy
People have the right to live wherever they want People have the right to live wherever they want
The liberal state must allow freedom of movement for citizens and non-citizens The liberal state must allow freedom of movement for citizens and non-citizens
Those countries that went to other countries and ruined them cannot turn immigrants away Those countries that went to other countries and ruined them cannot turn immigrants away
Accepting refugees benefits every party involved Accepting refugees benefits every party involved
Immigrants put an unnecessary strain on public services Immigrants put an unnecessary strain on public services
Immigrants erode local culture and traditions Immigrants erode local culture and traditions
Immigrants increase competition for work Immigrants increase competition for work
Debate Mini Map

Should countries accept immigrants?
Back to question

Yes, countries should accept immigrants

(1 of 2) Next position >

Accepting refugees benefits every party involved

Welcoming refugees protects their right to live, enters them into the labor force and boosts the economy, and benefits the countries they came from in the medium- to long- term.
Dany Bahar
< (5 of 5) Next argument >

The Argument

Counter arguments

Proponents

Premises

Rejecting the premises

Further Reading

The source of this argument (win-win-win situation): https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2018/06/19/refugees-are-a-win-win-win-formula-for-economic-development/

References

This page was last edited on Tuesday, 6 Oct 2020 at 01:37 UTC

Explore related arguments