Home Categories About
argument top image
Should pornography be banned for people under 18? Should pornography be banned for people under 18?
No, minors should be allowed to explore sexuality No, minors should be allowed to explore sexuality
Yes, porn is harmful and misleading and should be banned for minors Yes, porn is harmful and misleading and should be banned for minors
Banning pornography makes it seem like forbidden fruit Banning pornography makes it seem like forbidden fruit
Puberty and sexual desires begin before 18 years old Puberty and sexual desires begin before 18 years old
Minors would find porn which is not covered by the ban Minors would find porn which is not covered by the ban
A porn ban would teach sexual shame A porn ban would teach sexual shame
Children are able to discover their sexual preferences Children are able to discover their sexual preferences
Normalising pornography would create more progressive porn Normalising pornography would create more progressive porn
Pornography promotes sexist and sexually objectifying behavior Pornography promotes sexist and sexually objectifying behavior
Porn is linked to sexual violence perpetration/victimization Porn is linked to sexual violence perpetration/victimization
Children can experience emotional distress because of pornography Children can experience emotional distress because of pornography
Children get addicted to pornography easily Children get addicted to pornography easily
Debate Mini Map

Should pornography be banned for people under 18?
Back to question

No, minors should be allowed to explore sexuality

(1 of 2) Next position >

A porn ban would teach sexual shame

Sexual shame can cause psychosexual damage to a young person. Banning pornography could further the message that sex is unclean or unnatural, which is not true.
< (4 of 6) Next argument >

The Argument

Counter arguments

Premises

Rejecting the premises

References

This page was last edited on Wednesday, 14 Oct 2020 at 12:05 UTC

Explore related arguments