No, space flights are too dangerous
<
(3 of 3)
Probability of a space expedition failure is too high
A vast number of drone expeditions failed with the destruction of the spacecraft
<
(1 of 3)
Next argument >
Context
There have been already several failures on drone missions. A manned mission is way more complex and consequently the risks
The Argument
By considering the drone missions there have been quite a few failures which caused the destruction of the spacecraft. Even successful missions (such as Voyager) experienced some technical failures/issues which luckily still allows to accomplish most if not all mission objectives.
However since failures n this case does not imply loss of human lives, the level of acceptable risks is higher.
A human mission is more complex since it involves a life-maintain system that should ensure safety of the crew.Therefore the risks of a failure are higher.
Also no human mission can be considered successful unless astronauta are able to successfully return to Earth; so far all drone missions have been one-way
Counter arguments
High risks have already been taken in previous mission. It is estmated that Apollo missions had an estimate 50% of failure that might have resulted in fatalities.
Even in past centuries explorers take even more risks; in expedition like Magellan's circum-navaigation only a small number of original crew survived the trip.
Desire to explore make people accept enormous risks