Psychology doesn't have an agreed upon central body of knowledge
Unlike each of the hard sciences, psychology fails to deliver a concrete body of knowledge that is universally agreed upon by professionals in the field.
Psychology
Science
<
(3 of 3)
Next argument >
The Argument
Psychology lacks what true sciences are built upon: a universally accepted body of knowledge which describes how the world works. It also fails to yield a definition that is universally agreed upon. Psychology relies, instead, on following the scientific method to a fault. Professionals in the field are focused mainly on gathering data and statistics, which does not equal knowledge.[1]
Counter arguments
Proponents
Premises
[P1] Psychology does not have a consensual body of knowledge.
[P2] Psychology lacks a universally agreed upon definition.
Rejecting the premises
{Rejecting P1] Psychology has built up a repository of insights which are generally agreed upon by scientists in the field.
[Rejecting P2] Psychology is defined as "the study of mind and body."