VAR does not fit in with football match structure

During the early stages of testing of the VAR system, FIFA's claim that its interference on the game would be minimal was heavily criticised by those watching. In some cases, referees deliberated for minutes before making a decision. That is the sort of delay that is unacceptable to many fans who enjoy watching the game flow as seamlessly as possible. With little idea of why a decision is reviewed or by whom, players, coaches and fans are often left bemused as to what is going on. Delays to the game - particularly in cold weather - could increase the risk of players picking up injuries. Furthermore, as technology is only available at the very highest level, this creates a disconnect in the game. Only the elite benefit from the advantages of technology, creating something of an uneven playing field. Even at the very highest level, the Premier League has come in for criticism^[2] for its refusal to use VAR until they feel it has been sufficiently refined and players at international level criticised its use.^[3]

Increased use of technology necessitates stoppages and delays which do not sit well with football's established rhythm and routine. Technology is not applied at every level and even at the very highest level not all leagues are using it. It is creating an uneven playing field.